3/10ths sales tax use explained
Use of the 3/10ths sales tax fund in the parish has been under scrutiny.
After questions arose in an earlier meeting of the St. Mary Parish Council regarding the appropriate uses of the tax funds, legal counsel Eric Duplantis researched the details of the calls for the tax measures and delivered his legal opinion Wednesday.
There are two 3/10ths taxing districts: Wards 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 10 in west St. Mary, and in east St. Mary, Wards 5 and 8.
In Wards 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10 in west St. Mary, the parish’s use is limited to street lights, roads, highways, alleys and public places, improving and maintain public works or capital improvements such as sewerage collection and disposal, waterworks, drainage, water and flood control, fire protection, public safety and public health facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks and bridges.
The Wards 5 and 8 funds are virtually the same.
Duplantis pinpointed several items on the agenda to illustrate the proper and improper use of the fund.
Under the “old business” section of the agenda, there were three requests for funding: $10,000 to the Heritage Museum and Archive Center; another to the Council on Aging Meals on Wheels Program, from totaling $10,000; and $16,258 for the Save Our Children Mentoring Program. Councilman Dale Rogers asked that the Council on Aging be funded through the general fund.
There was another request from the Fit, Fun and Fabulous group for $1,000 that was rescinded by its sponsor.
Also, under “new business” Duplantis said proper allocations of the tax proceeds included items for $2,500 for bleachers for the St. Mary Fair Association; $3,000 for fire hydrants in Four Corners, which was withdrawn; and $20,000 for picnic tables and electrical upgrade for the bath house at Burns Point Campground.
Parish President David Hangriff spoke in favor of the Heritage Museum and hinted that it should be funted.
Councilman-elect Scott Ramsey addressed the council and said that if the council funds the museum, “we’ll have no choice but to file a friendly suit.”
He said that would be a waste of time, and the courts would likely side with Duplantis’ research.
